• About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Saturday, May 17, 2025
Manhattan Tribune
  • Home
  • World
  • International
  • Wall Street
  • Business
  • Health
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • International
  • Wall Street
  • Business
  • Health
No Result
View All Result
Manhattan Tribune
No Result
View All Result
Home National

Supreme Court ruling could spare rioters from January 6, 2021 assault

manhattantribune.com by manhattantribune.com
1 July 2024
in National
0
Supreme Court ruling could spare rioters from January 6, 2021 assault
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


The US Supreme Court on Friday limited the scope of a law used against supporters of former President Donald Trump who participated in the assault on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, by quashing one count against one of them.

The decision could indirectly impact federal charges against Trump for unlawfully attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election won by Joe Biden, since that charge is among the charges against him.

But this procedure is also suspended pending the Supreme Court’s decision – in principle on Monday – on the criminal immunity he claims as a former president.

In this case, the debate concerned the application to the assault on the Capitol, that is to say the attempt to disrupt the certification by Congress of the results of the presidential vote, of the charge of obstruction of an official procedure.

The Court, by a majority of six votes to three — five conservatives and one progressive against one conservative and two progressives — considers that this qualification cannot apply to Joseph Fischer, a former police officer, for his actions on January 6, 2021 .

To prove a violation of the law used in this case, the prosecution must “establish that the defendant compromised the availability or integrity of records, documents or objects intended for use in an official proceeding,” wrote to name of the majority the President of the Court, John Roberts.

On the contrary, in her dissent, conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett, joined by two progressive colleagues, accuses the majority of engaging in “semantic contortions” to give the law a more restrictive interpretation than that which she believes Congress intended.

The Minister of Justice Merrick Garland deplored in a press release this decision, which “limits an important federal law” used by his services to hold accountable the main perpetrators of January 6, 2021, “unprecedented attack against our institutional system”.

But it will “only have consequences on a small number of cases”, according to the ministry, specifying that of more than 1,400 people charged for their participation in the assault on the Capitol, less than 18% were prosecuted or found guilty of this charge.

Of those who were, around fifty were convicted on this charge alone and only 27 are currently serving a prison sentence, according to the same source.

To see in video

Tags: assaultCourtJanuaryriotersrulingspareSupreme
Previous Post

Wall Street in disarray, but Tesla stands out

Next Post

The most impressive debate performance in American history

Next Post
The most impressive debate performance in American history

The most impressive debate performance in American history

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Category

  • Blog
  • Business
  • Health
  • International
  • National
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Wall Street
  • World
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact

© 2023 Manhattan Tribune -By Millennium Press

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • International
  • World
  • Business
  • Science
  • National
  • Sports

© 2023 Manhattan Tribune -By Millennium Press