CNBC reported that “the US Navy has instructed its members not to use the Depc Sick” Chinese “company under any circumstance.
The warning, which was sent via e -mail on Friday, January 24, came under the title “An alert to crew members”, noting “possible security and moral concerns related to the source of the model and its use.”
This naval warning came after the emerging Chinese company “Deep Seck” managed to develop a system of artificial intelligence that competes with the leaders of the American industry on several standards, with limited resources, compared to what giant technology companies spend.
On January 20, Liang Whitheg, who was running investment funds in China, decided to invest in artificial intelligence. He succeeded in seizing 10,000 SIMs produced by Invidia, to launch the artificial intelligence model that caused confusion among the largest American technology companies.
These companies are still in a real confusion, about how to deal with “Deep Cick”, as most of them are heading to not giving what happened as important as it is not influential in the level of competition, especially since reports talk about large gaps in the new Chinese baby.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has defended his company’s investment of $ 65 billion in artificial intelligence, confirming the continuation of this trend in light of the increasing competition, especially after the appearance of the Chinese model. Zuckerberg told investors that there is a lot to learn from “Deep Seick”, but he believes that it is early to make a clear judgment on its impact on the future of artificial intelligence.
What Zuckerberg said is the “gray swan”; That name, which was launched by the American thinker of Lebanese origin, “Naseem Talib”, on the deep crisis that may strike the global markets optimistic with artificial intelligence, especially after the emergence of “Deep Seck”.
A student in his prediction in his book “The Black Swan” on the occurrence of the global crisis in 2008, based on the theory of black swan, which indicates the difficulty of predicting sudden events. Where this theory is based on the prevailing idea that the whole swan is white, while the presence of black pelicans is rare and surprising.
It was beforeUThe Black P it in Western Australia, which was an unexpected event. Will this time in his vision about the “gray swan”, he expected major financial collapses in the world of American technological companies, so that it will be a prelude to the inevitable war between China and the United States?
The contrast between the concepts of “black swan” and “gray swan” exceeds the difference in color, as well as the content. Naseem Talib considers that the American observer looks at the risks that can be partially predicted in the markets, but he often ignores or reduces it and thus creates a gray area.
This is because the markets may suddenly discover that they have erred in their expectations and accounts, and they bear witness to the major collapses. This is what happened with the largest company in the world, which is the Anvia, which collapsed on January 27, as it lost more than 600 billion dollars of its value in one day, and Talib believes that this is an early warning of what will happen in the future in the world of Western companies. .
The major American companies are still looking at the “Deep Sick” model as a Chinese bubble to spread confusion about Oben AI, with the aim of obstructing the “Star Gate” project launched by US President Donald Trump in investing in the field of artificial intelligence; To prevent China from excelling in this field.
Regardless of what the American administration and its companies think, but it seems that the Chinese government is pushing its companies to differentiate in this field, not to confuse the global technology markets, as much as it is part of the Chinese -Russian efforts to remove Western domination to the global system.
That is why China avoids any direct military confrontation with America, and this is what it has succeeded for years, despite the repeated American provocations of its implication in a war with Taiwan, after Washington intentionally vetoed the “one China” law.
China does not want to follow the footsteps of its ally Russia in eastern Ukraine, but rather went in the opposite direction, is to destabilize the financial markets of the United States, given that this is the perfect choice to deter Washington globally. That is, by hitting the dominance of its companies that seek to surround any emerging company. Beijing touched this with Trump’s first presidential state when he imposed more sanctions on the Chinese communications giant “Huawei”; In order to deter it from making a serious competition for American telecommunications companies, led by Apple.
What was caused by the company “Deep Sik”, despite what was said and is said about its quality and ability to compete with the American technology world, represents for the Chinese government “a gray swad” that hit its goal in the world of artificial intelligence. Where its low -cost approach ignited fears that major American companies have pumped many investments in developing artificial intelligence, while emerging tray offers similar performance models and low -cost investments.
China is fluent in the United States economically, so it may not stop when a bubble is launched in the financial markets, but may go further by providing opportunities to seriously compete in the world of digital technology. This is what the Chinese company Ali Baba announced by launching a new version of its artificial intelligence models QWEN 2.5 MAX, which it considers to be superior to the Chinese “Deep Sik” model, and on the performance of the GBT in terms of performance, according to Reuters.
The appearance of the gray swan in the world of artificial intelligence, which may put the United States in front of a real challenge, was unable to “threaten the imposition of sanctions” to confront or limit it. Will Washington change its accent with China, to use the language of war, as a last step to stop the rising Chinese crawl?
The opinions in the article do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al -Jazeera.
