• About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Friday, May 9, 2025
Manhattan Tribune
  • Home
  • World
  • International
  • Wall Street
  • Business
  • Health
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • International
  • Wall Street
  • Business
  • Health
No Result
View All Result
Manhattan Tribune
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

Trump’s eye on Greenland…an old project with new consequences economy

manhattantribune.com by manhattantribune.com
8 January 2025
in Business
0
Trump’s eye on Greenland…an old project with new consequences economy
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


US President-elect Donald Trump has revived a controversial proposal he had put forward in 2019, which is to buy Greenland, the largest island in the world that enjoys self-rule under Danish sovereignty.

While the proposal was met with complete rejection by Denmark when it was first raised, Trump reopened the file with a threat to impose “very high trade tariffs” on Denmark if it did not accept the deal, according to a Bloomberg report.

The geopolitical importance of Greenland

According to the agency, Greenland is not only an island with a vast area larger than Mexico and Saudi Arabia, but it is also a strategic gateway located between the North Atlantic Ocean and North America.

The island is a center of global interests due to its vast reserves of minerals and fossil fuels. It also hosts the American Thule Air Base, which is considered the most important in the far north for monitoring missile threats and tracking space objects.

Speaking about the importance of Greenland, Trump noted that it is “essential to America’s national security.” During his first term, he previously described it as a “big real estate deal” that could ease Denmark’s financial burdens.

The island is a center of global interests due to its huge reserves of minerals and fossil fuels (Reuters)

Economic dimensions of the deal

According to a Bloomberg report, Greenland’s GDP is $3.2 billion (according to World Bank statistics for 2021), and Denmark supports it annually with about $600 million. Despite this, the island faces major economic challenges, relying heavily on fishing and primary industries.

Although Greenland is “not for sale”, any estimate of its price may be based on looking at these numbers.

For comparison, the cost of purchasing Alaska from Russia in 1867 was $7.2 million, the equivalent of about $150 million today.

Legal and political obstacles

Legally, Professor Rasmus Leander Nielsen of the University of Greenland stressed to Bloomberg that the 2009 autonomy law prohibits the sale of the island, as it recognizes Greenlanders as an “independent people.” He explained that any purchase would require the island’s independence first, something still under discussion among local politicians.

In this context, Greenland’s Prime Minister, Moti Borup Egede, said: “Greenland will never be for sale.” However, he added that the island is open to trade cooperation with the world, especially in the field of vital minerals.

This position reflects growing interest in Greenland’s economic and political independence, as its government last year issued a defense and security policy document calling for strengthening ties with North America.

Greenland Prime Minister Moti Borup Egede stressed: “Greenland will never be for sale” (Shutterstock)

Historical background to land purchases

Historically, land purchases have not been unusual for the United States. It purchased Louisiana from France for $15 million in 1803, and Alaska from Russia for $7.2 million. In fact, Denmark itself sold what is now the US Virgin Islands in 1917.

However, a Bloomberg report noted that the current market for sovereign land is “dry,” according to an academic study.

If Trump insists on moving forward with this proposal, it will not be simple. Under the US Constitution, any land purchase requires Congress to approve its financing. But Trump has previously shown a willingness to bypass Congress on similar issues, such as when he used the Pentagon budget to build the border wall with Mexico.

For his part, Professor Joseph Blucher of Duke University Law School expressed doubts about the success of such deals in the modern era, writing that “the market for sovereign land appears to have dried up.”

While Trump believes that purchasing Greenland could enhance national security and achieve strategic gains, legal and diplomatic obstacles make this idea difficult to achieve.

Tags: consequenceseconomyEyeGreenland...anprojectTrumps
Previous Post

Stormy Daniels affair | Trump goes to Supreme Court to avoid sentencing

Next Post

Tweeters: There is no longer fear at Damascus International Airport Economy News

Next Post
Tweeters: There is no longer fear at Damascus International Airport Economy News

Tweeters: There is no longer fear at Damascus International Airport Economy News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Category

  • Blog
  • Business
  • Health
  • International
  • National
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Wall Street
  • World
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact

© 2023 Manhattan Tribune -By Millennium Press

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • International
  • World
  • Business
  • Science
  • National
  • Sports

© 2023 Manhattan Tribune -By Millennium Press